Recently while reading my Twitter feed I realized that I click through to a fair number of articles from the New York Times. I also listen to On The Media a lot, which is constantly bemoaning the impending doom of proper journalism paragons like the NYT, and the consequential downfall of mankind.
So I decided, not because I was annoyed by a paywall, but just because I want to pay my share for a valuable service, to purchase a subscription to the New York Times. I clicked through to their site and JIMINY CHRISTMAS IT IS OUTRAGEOUSLY EXPENSIVE. The least you can pay for the New York Times is $195 per year! Now I'm not hurting for cash, but I know the value of a dollar (sort of). That rate just does not fit with even my extravagant digital life, which means it's definitely too much for most people. That's:
(The best rationale I can think of is that they're still trying to cling to their print business, whose losses would be accelerated even further if digital access were priced to within spitting distance of the paper version, which is cheaper than web, ridiculously.) This experience has reduced my sympathy to the plight of ad-supported media as it transitions to a modern payment model. If this is what news organizations are doing to try to save themselves, they need an even bigger kick in the pants than I thought. (This is all to say nothing of the insulting price tiers. Really guys? More than a 2X increase in ongoing rate, forever, just to get your stupid app? Stab.) |